The page that gets slower
New photos and scripts accumulate. Check what actually delays the page before replacing its design.
Meet Milo by Splice Work
You built a website to grow your business. Keeping it useful shouldn’t become another job.
Bring the checks, small fixes and next improvements into one clear workflow. See what needs attention, review the change, then decide what goes live.
A proposed website care service. Built around your site, with a person in charge.
A little attention goes a long way
Let’s tidy a few things.
Give that image a lighter load
Ready to preview
Put a broken link back on track
Change proposed
Make the page title more useful
Needs your review
The little things add up
The oversized image. The old service description. The button that goes nowhere. Individually, they look small. Together, they make a good website harder to use—and give your team another pile of work to remember.
New photos and scripts accumulate. Check what actually delays the page before replacing its design.
An old price, opening time or service description survives the last update. Make the correction once, in the right places.
A moved page leaves a broken link behind. Trace the route your visitor was taking and give them a useful next step.
One request. A clear way through.
Bring the request into Slack. We turn it into a defined piece of work, show you a preview and explain what changed. You can ask for an edit in the same conversation. A proposal is something to review; a published change is a separate step.
Name the page, the problem and what a useful result would look like. Ask when something is missing.
Check the page and relevant search data. Separate what the sources show from what still needs a decision.
Prepare the correction or content update against the agreed scope. Keep useful copy and existing search intent.
Use your approved images, size them for the layout and write descriptions that explain what they show.
Check links, metadata, mobile layout and page weight. Automated findings identify work; they are not proof of a fix.
Package the changes in a reviewable version, with the reason for the edit and its boundaries.
Open the working page on a phone or a computer. Read the content and try the path your customer will take.
Say yes, request a revision or leave it pending. Publication follows your approval of the proposed work.
Release the approved version, then check the live result. Keep a clear record of the change.
Review the available search, visitor and performance data. Use it to choose the next useful improvement.
Try a small example
Choose an issue, then switch between the current page and the proposed fix. This is an illustration of the review experience, not a customer result or a live scan.
The finding
The service button points to an old address.
Switch views to see the proposed response. In your workflow, a person reviews the actual page before publication.
The visitor is ready to learn more, but the next page has moved.
/our-old-services/ → page not found
What we would test
Test the button and its destination on mobile and desktop.
Useful work, clearly defined
Care starts with a supported site and an agreed list of responsibilities. The proposed packages combine scheduled checks with a capped amount of work on existing pages. Finding ten issues does not silently commit you to ten extra charges—or mean ten fixes have shipped.
Review broken links, page availability, titles, descriptions, canonical URLs and sitemap coverage. Changes should preserve useful destinations and the purpose of each page. A redirect or indexing change deserves a reason, not just a cleaner-looking report.
Look at image sizes, loading behavior and layout on small screens. Use Lighthouse to identify possible improvements, then check the actual page. Automated accessibility checks help find issues such as contrast or missing labels; they do not certify the whole website.
Correct supplied business details, repair an unclear section and refresh approved images. Larger research or new-page work needs a separate scope. Your knowledge of the business remains the source for prices, services and customer claims.
Keep the finding, the proposed work, its review status and the outcome together. Where measurements are available, label the source and date. If Google has not collected enough data, say so. A published edit and an improvement in search traffic are different results.
The initial fit is an existing Next.js site on Vercel with a GitHub repository. We review your setup before agreeing a package. WordPress, Shopify and other platforms need a separate fit assessment; this page does not promise a ready-made maintenance service for every stack.
A rhythm, not a mystery
This is the proposed cadence. The work queue depends on your package, the site’s condition and what you approve. Urgent incidents need their own support arrangement.
Review the site checks and the requests waiting in your queue.
Prioritize customer impact and the evidence behind each finding.
Prepare a bounded change and share the working preview.
Review the proposal, ask for edits or approve publication.
Check approved releases and record what is done or still pending.
Start with your own page
Paste a URL to run Google’s PageSpeed Insights test. It reports Lighthouse findings for performance, accessibility, best practices and SEO. The report runs on Google’s site when you request it, so it adds no scan or third-party script to this page’s load.
Start with the slow-loading elements and the failed checks. Then ask which changes would help an actual visitor. A high score is useful evidence about a test; it is not a promise of rankings or a complete website diagnosis.
Want help turning findings into work? Bring the report to a website walkthrough.
Find the right amount of care
An occasional correction and a regular queue need different amounts of care. Compare the proposed Care, Operate and Commerce plans on our pricing page, including monthly fees, change allowances and separately scoped work. We confirm the fit with you before anything starts.
Your website stays yours
Your domain, repository, content and hosting accounts should stay under your control. Approved changes live in your site, with a history you can hand to another developer. Existing software and image licenses still apply; paying for maintenance does not transfer a third party’s rights.
Before you start, the agreement should state the cancellation notice, final billing, access removal and handover steps. If you leave, the handover should include completed work, open requests and anything the next maintainer needs to know. Those terms are confirmed with the package, rather than hidden behind the headline price.
The aim is to maintain useful, accessible pages and fix problems that get in the way. Search positions depend on competition, relevance and other factors. Neither a maintenance package nor a perfect audit score guarantees rankings, traffic or leads.
The proposed service includes a preview and your approval before publication. You can request revisions or leave a proposal pending. We agree who is authorized to approve work when the service is set up.
Potentially. We first review its framework, hosting, repository access and existing issues. A supported setup can move into a maintenance package; a migration or substantial repair needs its own scope before recurring care makes sense.
It covers defined website work. Brand strategy, paid campaigns, social media management, photography and link acquisition are separate responsibilities. The package should complement the people doing those jobs, with clear ownership of the website queue.
No. PageSpeed Insights tests a URL and reports automated findings. It does not inspect your whole business, verify all accessibility requirements or explain every search issue. Use it as a starting point, then review the findings in the context of your website.
Bring the URL and the work that keeps slipping down the list. We’ll discuss the fit, the priorities and a package with clear boundaries.